Denis Kudla vs Hamad Medjedovic — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB
Hamad Medjedovic
#69ATP
1841ELO
1662Grass ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
Kudla D.
6-3 7-6
Medjedovic H.
Kudla D.
6772
Medjedovic H.
3650

Denis Kudla defeated Hamad Medjedovic 6-3 7-6 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Medjedovic H.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Medjedovic H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Medjedovic H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
97
Break points won·Clear edge
19
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Medjedovic H.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Medjedovic H.
Freshness·
—
100

Medjedovic H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-0
Kubler J.[4]
Cazaux A.
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-11-0
Piros Z.
Broom C.
6-736-37-62
Ofner S.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Kubler J.[4]
Shang J.
6-36-4
R16
Broom C.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Piros Z.
Bolt A.
6-41-66-3
Shang J.
Goffin D.
6-16-716-4
Cazaux A.
Tirante T.
6-13-1
Shimabukuro S.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Kudla D.
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Ofner S.[3]
Virtanen O.
6-41-66-4
Kubler J.[4]
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Goffin D.
Stricker D.[6]
7-51-3
Broom C.
Brouwer G.
7-656-2
Brancaccio R.
Monday J.
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Samuel T.
2-67-667-5
Piros Z.
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-796-37-67
Ofner S.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-614-66-1
Bellucci M.
Klein L.
4-66-46-4
Kubler J.[4]
Ritschard A.
6-36-736-3
Cazaux A.
Diallo G.
6-37-61
Tirante T.
Borges N.[1]
4-66-36-4
Kudla D.
Medjedovic H.
6-37-65
Shimabukuro S.
Wendelken H.
6-26-726-2
Hijikata R.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-687-5
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Virtanen O.
Gombos N.
7-627-5