Jason Kubler vs Juncheng Shang — Ilkley CH Quarter-final

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS4
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1679Grass ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1651Grass ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Kubler J.
6-3 6-4
Shang J.
Kubler J.
662
Shang J.
340

Jason Kubler defeated Juncheng Shang 6-3 6-4 in the Ilkley CH quarter-final on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Shang J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
96
Break points won·Even
46
45
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Shang J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+29 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Grass Elo 1651
4.2Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1746
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
3.8
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-0
Kubler J.[4]
Cazaux A.
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-11-0
Piros Z.
Broom C.
6-736-37-62
Ofner S.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Kubler J.[4]
Shang J.
6-36-4
R16
Broom C.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Piros Z.
Bolt A.
6-41-66-3
Shang J.
Goffin D.
6-16-716-4
Cazaux A.
Tirante T.
6-13-1
Shimabukuro S.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Kudla D.
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Ofner S.[3]
Virtanen O.
6-41-66-4
Kubler J.[4]
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Goffin D.
Stricker D.[6]
7-51-3
Broom C.
Brouwer G.
7-656-2
Brancaccio R.
Monday J.
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Samuel T.
2-67-667-5
Piros Z.
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-796-37-67
Ofner S.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-614-66-1
Bellucci M.
Klein L.
4-66-46-4
Kubler J.[4]
Ritschard A.
6-36-736-3
Cazaux A.
Diallo G.
6-37-61
Tirante T.
Borges N.[1]
4-66-36-4
Kudla D.
Medjedovic H.
6-37-65
Shimabukuro S.
Wendelken H.
6-26-726-2
Hijikata R.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-687-5
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Virtanen O.
Gombos N.
7-627-5