Jason Kubler vs Alexander Ritschard — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS4
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1679Grass ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1469Grass ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Kubler J.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Ritschard A.
Kubler J.
66362
Ritschard A.
37731

Jason Kubler defeated Alexander Ritschard 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
84
Break points won·Dominant
46
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
41
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
37
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Ritschard A.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.6+210 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Grass Elo 1469
7.0Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1528
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
3.2
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-0
Kubler J.[4]
Cazaux A.
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-11-0
Piros Z.
Broom C.
6-736-37-62
Ofner S.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Kubler J.[4]
Shang J.
6-36-4
R16
Broom C.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Piros Z.
Bolt A.
6-41-66-3
Shang J.
Goffin D.
6-16-716-4
Cazaux A.
Tirante T.
6-13-1
Shimabukuro S.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Kudla D.
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Ofner S.[3]
Virtanen O.
6-41-66-4
Kubler J.[4]
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Goffin D.
Stricker D.[6]
7-51-3
Broom C.
Brouwer G.
7-656-2
Brancaccio R.
Monday J.
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Samuel T.
2-67-667-5
Piros Z.
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-796-37-67
Ofner S.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-614-66-1
Bellucci M.
Klein L.
4-66-46-4
Kubler J.[4]
Ritschard A.
6-36-736-3
Cazaux A.
Diallo G.
6-37-61
Tirante T.
Borges N.[1]
4-66-36-4
Kudla D.
Medjedovic H.
6-37-65
Shimabukuro S.
Wendelken H.
6-26-726-2
Hijikata R.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-687-5
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Virtanen O.
Gombos N.
7-627-5