Juncheng Shang vs David Goffin — Ilkley CH Round of 16

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1651Grass ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
David Goffin
BEL
David Goffin
#251ATP
1665ELO
1649Grass ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Shang J.
6-1 6-7 6-4
Goffin D.
Shang J.
66162
Goffin D.
17741

Juncheng Shang defeated David Goffin 6-1 6-7 6-4 in the Ilkley CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Juncheng Shang came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Goffin D.

Goffin D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Goffin D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 184). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Goffin D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
82
Break points saved·Even
96
96
Break points won·Clear edge
45
64
Deciding sets·Even
94
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Goffin D.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+2 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Grass Elo 1649
6.0Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
6.5
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-0
Kubler J.[4]
Cazaux A.
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-11-0
Piros Z.
Broom C.
6-736-37-62
Ofner S.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Kubler J.[4]
Shang J.
6-36-4
R16
Broom C.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Piros Z.
Bolt A.
6-41-66-3
Shang J.
Goffin D.
6-16-716-4
Cazaux A.
Tirante T.
6-13-1
Shimabukuro S.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Kudla D.
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Ofner S.[3]
Virtanen O.
6-41-66-4
Kubler J.[4]
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Goffin D.
Stricker D.[6]
7-51-3
Broom C.
Brouwer G.
7-656-2
Brancaccio R.
Monday J.
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Samuel T.
2-67-667-5
Piros Z.
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-796-37-67
Ofner S.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-614-66-1
Bellucci M.
Klein L.
4-66-46-4
Kubler J.[4]
Ritschard A.
6-36-736-3
Cazaux A.
Diallo G.
6-37-61
Tirante T.
Borges N.[1]
4-66-36-4
Kudla D.
Medjedovic H.
6-37-65
Shimabukuro S.
Wendelken H.
6-26-726-2
Hijikata R.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-687-5
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Virtanen O.
Gombos N.
7-627-5