Venus Williams vs Camila Giorgi — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
Venus Williams
USA
Venus Williams
1654ELO
1576Grass ELO
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
Williams V.
7-6 4-6 7-6
Giorgi C.
Williams V.
774782
Giorgi C.
656661

Venus Williams defeated Camila Giorgi 7-6 4-6 7-6 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Venus Williams came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Venus Williams extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-27US OpenR64hardVenus Williams6-4 7-5
2015-01-19Australian OpenR32hardVenus Williams4-6 7-6(3) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Williams V.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Giorgi C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Williams V.

Serve advantage — Giorgi C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Williams V.Giorgi C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
37%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
52%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
6.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Williams V.Giorgi C.
Clutch Rating·Even
54
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
71
Break points won·Even
83
81
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
45
Tiebreaks·Even
86
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Williams V.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Giorgi C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Williams V.Giorgi C.
Freshness·
100
—

Williams V.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3