Linda Fruhvirtova vs Bernarda Pera — Birmingham Round of 16

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 16
Linda Fruhvirtova
CZE
Linda Fruhvirtova
#184WTA
1625ELO
1528Grass ELO
21 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Bernarda Pera
USA6
Bernarda Pera
#773WTA
1653ELO
1545Grass ELO
31 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Fruhvirtova L.
6-1 7-6
Pera B.
Fruhvirtova L.
6772
Pera B.
1630

Linda Fruhvirtova defeated Bernarda Pera 6-1 7-6 in the Birmingham round of 16 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Linda Fruhvirtova came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fruhvirtova L.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Pera B.

Pera B.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fruhvirtova L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fruhvirtova L.Pera B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
41%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
5.3
5.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (160 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fruhvirtova L.Pera B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
56
Break points saved·Dominant
49
87
Break points won·Even
75
79
Deciding sets·Slight edge
49
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
14
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fruhvirtova L.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Pera B.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.3Grass Elo 1528
Surface ELO
4.7+17 Grass Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1625
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1653
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
1.1
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fruhvirtova L.Pera B.
Freshness·
100
—

Fruhvirtova L.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3