Albert Ramos vs Giovanni Fonio — Montechiarugolo CH Round of 16

Montechiarugolo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
clay
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1319Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Ramos A.
6-1 3-6 6-3
Fonio G.
Ramos A.
6362
Fonio G.
1631

Albert Ramos defeated Giovanni Fonio 6-1 3-6 6-3 in the Montechiarugolo CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Fonio G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Fonio G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Fonio G.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Fonio G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
6
Break points saved·Dominant
95
63
Break points won·Dominant
49
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Fonio G.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+207 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1319
7.6Overall Elo 1558
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Muller A.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Maestrelli F.
Zeppieri G.[6]
6-46-747-62
Muller A.[3]
Travaglia S.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-37-65
Muller A.[3]
Giannessi A.
3-66-36-1
Maestrelli F.
Collarini A.
6-46-0
Zeppieri G.[6]
Ramos A.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Maestrelli F.
Napolitano S.
7-636-3
Travaglia S.
Gigante M.
6-47-62
Zeppieri G.[6]
Bonadio R.
6-27-5
Monteiro T.[2]
Rola B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Gaio F.
7-56-2
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Caruso S.
7-56-4
Ramos A.[1]
Fonio G.
6-13-66-3
R32
Travaglia S.
Lavagno E.
6-20-0
Gaio F.
Forti F.
7-647-62
Monteiro T.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-46-4
Bonadio R.
Darderi L.
7-636-4
Collarini A.
Popko D.
6-46-3
Muller A.[3]
Marti Pujolras A.
6-46-3
Zeppieri G.[6]
Bobrov B.
6-46-3
Napolitano S.
Cuevas P.
4-66-36-1
Fonio G.
Moroni F.
6-36-2
Giannessi A.
Janvier M.
6-44-66-1
Rola B.
Weis A.
6-31-66-3
Gigante M.
Kovalik J.[8]
6-47-65
Roca Batalla O.
Andreev A.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Passaro F.[7]
6-44-67-5
Maestrelli F.
Munar J.[4]
7-56-3
Ramos A.[1]
Verdasco F.
6-26-3