Caty Mcnally vs Lauren Davis — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
Caty Mcnally
USA
Caty Mcnally
#50WTA
1817ELO
1707Grass ELO
$711kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
USA
Lauren Davis
#1383WTA
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Mcnally C.
6-1 7-5
Davis L.
Mcnally C.
672
Davis L.
150

Caty Mcnally defeated Lauren Davis 6-1 7-5 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Caty Mcnally came in ranked #50, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Caty Mcnally came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mcnally C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mcnally C.

Serve advantage — Mcnally C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mcnally C.Davis L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
47%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.2
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcnally C.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
73
51
Break points saved·Dominant
73
26
Break points won·Clear edge
99
79
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
86
Tiebreaks·Even
78
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mcnally C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Davis L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mcnally C.Davis L.
Freshness·
95
—

Mcnally C.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3