Holger Rune vs Maxime Cressy — Queen's Club Round of 32

Queen's Club · ATP · Round of 32
Holger Rune
DEN2
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1628Grass ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
USA
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
Rune H.
7-6 7-6
Cressy M.
Rune H.
77772
Cressy M.
64630

Holger Rune defeated Maxime Cressy 7-6 7-6 in the Queen's Club round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #81, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Holger Rune extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-06MontpellierSFhardMaxime Cressy7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(4)
2023-01-16Australian OpenR64hardHolger Rune7-5 6-4 6-4
2022-04-11Monte Carlo MastersQ2clayHolger Rune6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Cressy M.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Cressy M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
13.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
9.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 115). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Cressy M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
24
Break points saved·Even
99
96
Break points won·Dominant
84
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Cressy M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.9
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 10
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
2.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°CDrizzle
Wind 22 km/hHumidity 60%
Final
Alcaraz C.[1]
De Minaur A.[7]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Korda S.
6-36-4
De Minaur A.[7]
Rune H.[2]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Korda S.
Norrie C.[5]
6-47-61
De Minaur A.[7]
Mannarino A.
6-44-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Musetti L.[6]
6-47-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Dimitrov G.
6-46-4
R16
Dimitrov G.
Cerundolo F.[8]
6-37-5
Korda S.
Tiafoe F.[4]
7-626-3
Norrie C.[5]
Thompson J.
4-66-36-2
De Minaur A.[7]
Schwartzman D.
6-26-2
Mannarino A.
Fritz T.[3]
6-47-67
Musetti L.[6]
Shelton B.
6-44-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Lehecka J.
6-26-3
R32
Rune H.[2]
Cressy M.
7-647-63
Dimitrov G.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Cerundolo F.[8]
Paul T.
7-624-66-4
Korda S.
Evans D.
6-47-5
Schwartzman D.
Mcdonald M.
6-26-4
Mannarino A.
Broady L.
1-66-46-3
Shelton B.
Wolf J.
7-647-62
Thompson J.
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Rinderknech A.
4-67-57-63
Lehecka J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-646-3
Fritz T.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-47-5
Peniston R.
Humbert U.
6-46-2
De Minaur A.[7]
Murray A.
6-36-1
Tiafoe F.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-26-4
Norrie C.[5]
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-65
Musetti L.[6]
Choinski J.
6-46-2