Barbora Krejcikova vs Cristina Bucsa — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
Barbora Krejcikova
CZE1
Barbora Krejcikova
#38WTA
1874ELO
1773Grass ELO
$650kYTD
$19MCAREER
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Cristina Bucsa
ESP
Cristina Bucsa
#35WTA
1722ELO
1594Grass ELO
$900kYTD
$5.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Krejcikova B.
6-3 6-3
Bucsa C.
Krejcikova B.
662
Bucsa C.
330

Barbora Krejcikova defeated Cristina Bucsa 6-3 6-3 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Cristina Bucsa came in ranked #35.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krejcikova B.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bucsa C.

Bucsa C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Krejcikova B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krejcikova B.Bucsa C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krejcikova B.Bucsa C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
92
60
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
79
Break points won·Even
92
93
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krejcikova B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Bucsa C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
6.8+179 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Grass Elo 1594
6.2Overall Elo 1874
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1722
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krejcikova B.Bucsa C.
Freshness·
79
—

Krejcikova B.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3