Zsombor Piros vs Charles Broom — Ilkley CH Quarter-final

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1552Grass ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1386Grass ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Piros Z.
6-7 6-3 7-6
Broom C.
Piros Z.
636772
Broom C.
773621

Zsombor Piros defeated Charles Broom 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Ilkley CH quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
10
Break points saved·Dominant
84
56
Break points won·Dominant
32
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Broom C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+166 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Grass Elo 1386
8.2Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
8.5
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Broom C.
Freshness·Clear edge
54
77

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-0
Kubler J.[4]
Cazaux A.
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-11-0
Piros Z.
Broom C.
6-736-37-62
Ofner S.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Kubler J.[4]
Shang J.
6-36-4
R16
Broom C.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Piros Z.
Bolt A.
6-41-66-3
Shang J.
Goffin D.
6-16-716-4
Cazaux A.
Tirante T.
6-13-1
Shimabukuro S.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Kudla D.
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Ofner S.[3]
Virtanen O.
6-41-66-4
Kubler J.[4]
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Goffin D.
Stricker D.[6]
7-51-3
Broom C.
Brouwer G.
7-656-2
Brancaccio R.
Monday J.
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Samuel T.
2-67-667-5
Piros Z.
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-796-37-67
Ofner S.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-614-66-1
Bellucci M.
Klein L.
4-66-46-4
Kubler J.[4]
Ritschard A.
6-36-736-3
Cazaux A.
Diallo G.
6-37-61
Tirante T.
Borges N.[1]
4-66-36-4
Kudla D.
Medjedovic H.
6-37-65
Shimabukuro S.
Wendelken H.
6-26-726-2
Hijikata R.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-687-5
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Virtanen O.
Gombos N.
7-627-5