Charles Broom vs Raul Brancaccio — Ilkley CH Round of 16

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1386Grass ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Raul Brancaccio
ITA
Raul Brancaccio
#230ATP
1492ELO
1415Grass ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
Broom C.
6-1 6-4
Brancaccio R.
Broom C.
662
Brancaccio R.
140

Charles Broom defeated Raul Brancaccio 6-1 6-4 in the Ilkley CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Brancaccio R.

Brancaccio R.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Brancaccio R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 166). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Brancaccio R.
Clutch Rating·Even
10
11
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
49
Break points won·Clear edge
0
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Brancaccio R.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0Grass Elo 1386
Surface ELO
5.0+30 Grass Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1492
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broom C.Brancaccio R.
Freshness·Clear edge
77
62

Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Brancaccio R.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 78 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-0
Kubler J.[4]
Cazaux A.
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-11-0
Piros Z.
Broom C.
6-736-37-62
Ofner S.[3]
Kudla D.
6-26-2
Kubler J.[4]
Shang J.
6-36-4
R16
Broom C.
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Piros Z.
Bolt A.
6-41-66-3
Shang J.
Goffin D.
6-16-716-4
Cazaux A.
Tirante T.
6-13-1
Shimabukuro S.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Kudla D.
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Ofner S.[3]
Virtanen O.
6-41-66-4
Kubler J.[4]
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
R32
Goffin D.
Stricker D.[6]
7-51-3
Broom C.
Brouwer G.
7-656-2
Brancaccio R.
Monday J.
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Samuel T.
2-67-667-5
Piros Z.
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-796-37-67
Ofner S.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Bergs Z.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-614-66-1
Bellucci M.
Klein L.
4-66-46-4
Kubler J.[4]
Ritschard A.
6-36-736-3
Cazaux A.
Diallo G.
6-37-61
Tirante T.
Borges N.[1]
4-66-36-4
Kudla D.
Medjedovic H.
6-37-65
Shimabukuro S.
Wendelken H.
6-26-726-2
Hijikata R.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-687-5
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-37-62
Virtanen O.
Gombos N.
7-627-5