Emina Bektas vs Shuai Zhang — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
USA
Emina Bektas
#581WTA
1510ELO
1465Grass ELO
33 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Shuai Zhang
CHN7
Shuai Zhang
#64WTA
1718ELO
1619Grass ELO
37 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Bektas E.
6-4 6-3
Zhang S.
Bektas E.
662
Zhang S.
430

Emina Bektas defeated Shuai Zhang 6-4 6-3 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Shuai Zhang came in ranked #64, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Emina Bektas closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bektas E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zhang S.

Zhang S.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bektas E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bektas E.Zhang S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bektas E.Zhang S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
62
Break points saved·Dominant
82
55
Break points won·Dominant
35
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
71
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bektas E.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhang S.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Grass Elo 1465
Surface ELO
7.0+154 Grass Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1510
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1718
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 9
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
9.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bektas E.Zhang S.
Freshness·
—
96

Zhang S.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3