Zdenek Kolar vs Facundo Diaz Acosta — Poznan CH Quarter-final

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Zdenek Kolar
CZE
Zdenek Kolar
#154ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
clay
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG4
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#120ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
Kolar Z.
6-3 6-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Kolar Z.
662
Diaz Acosta F.
310

Zdenek Kolar defeated Facundo Diaz Acosta 6-3 6-1 in the Poznan CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Diaz Acosta came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kolar Z.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Diaz Acosta F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kolar Z.Diaz Acosta F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kolar Z.Diaz Acosta F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
58
Break points saved·Dominant
53
89
Break points won·Slight edge
28
33
Deciding sets·Slight edge
58
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kolar Z.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Diaz Acosta F.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1485
Surface ELO
6.0+184 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1506
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1681
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
3.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kolar Z.Diaz Acosta F.
Freshness·Dominant
86
41

Kolar Z.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d) · Diaz Acosta F.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Navone M.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Navone M.
Stodder T.
6-26-0
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Blanch U.
6-35-77-5
Stodder T.
Michalski D.
6-16-4
Kolar Z.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
6-36-1
Navone M.
Guinard M.
7-56-736-2
R16
Kolar Z.
Taberner C.
6-46-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-626-3
Blanch U.
Blanch D.
1-66-36-4
Guinard M.
Kym J.
6-36-4
Stodder T.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-43-66-0
Michalski D.
Molleker R.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-47-64
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Nagal S.
6-12-66-4
R32
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Mensik J.
7-683-67-611
Blanch U.
Sachko V.
7-650-0
Guinard M.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
6-24-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Houkes M.
6-17-62
Stodder T.
Jorda Sanchis D.
7-626-3
Martin Tiffon P.
Svrcina D.[8]
7-57-64
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
3-66-36-1
Molleker R.
Machac T.[3]
7-57-61
Kolar Z.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Giustino L.
3-66-26-4
Blanch D.
Shevchenko A.[1]
6-36-2
Taberner C.
Zuk K.
6-47-63
Nagal S.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Kym J.
Oberleitner N.
6-16-2
Michalski D.
Valkusz M.
5-76-46-1
Kasnikowski M.
Laaksonen H.
6-12-67-64