Bernard Tomic vs Donald Young — Palmas Del Mar CH Qualifying Round 1

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Bernard Tomic
AUS6
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
USA
Donald Young
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Tomic B.
6-4 6-2
Young D.
Tomic B.
662
Young D.
420

Bernard Tomic defeated Donald Young 6-4 6-2 in the Palmas Del Mar CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Donald Young came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Bernard Tomic narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-27AcapulcoR32hardDonald Young7-6(5) 0-0 RET
2016-07-18WashingtonR32hardBernard Tomic7-6(4) 6-3
2015-02-16Delray BeachSFhardDonald Young4-6 6-4 6-2
2015-02-09MemphisQFhardDonald Young7-6(8) 4-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Young D.

Young D.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Tomic B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Young D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
48%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Young D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
76
Break points won·Clear edge
4
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
26
Tiebreaks·Even
79
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Young D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Young D.
Freshness·Even
84
88

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Young D.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Zheng M.
Rodrigues D.
6-36-1
Heide G.[10]
Copil M.[1]
6-36-4
Tomic B.[6]
Kirchheimer S.[7]
7-53-66-3
Zhu E.[2]
Rybakov A.[8]
7-654-66-3
Sinclair C.[9]
Uesugi K.
6-17-64
Chappell N.[3]
Hallquist Lithen J.
4-66-36-3
Q1
Zhu E.[2]
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5
Rodrigues D.
Boitan G.[12]
6-27-5
Sinclair C.[9]
Wiersholm H.
6-26-1
Tomic B.[6]
Young D.
6-46-2
Chappell N.[3]
Boyer T.
7-636-2
Heide G.[10]
Nam J.
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.[7]
Brymer G.
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Ponwith N.[5]
6-47-66
Uesugi K.
Puttergill C.
6-36-1
Hallquist Lithen J.
Alves M.[11]
0-66-34-1
Rybakov A.[8]
Perez A.
5-76-16-2
Copil M.[1]
Evans G.
5-77-633-0
Zhu E.
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5