Bernard Tomic vs Dane Sweeny — Palmas Del Mar CH Round of 16

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
AUS5
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Tomic B.
6-4 7-6
Sweeny D.
Tomic B.
6772
Sweeny D.
4630

Bernard Tomic defeated Dane Sweeny 6-4 7-6 in the Palmas Del Mar CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
69
Break points won·Slight edge
4
11
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
68
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
5.4+3 Hard Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Clear edge
84
98

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nishikori K.
Zheng M.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Nishikori K.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-37-64
Quarter-finals
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Galarneau A.[8]
6-30-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Draxl L.
6-46-3
Heide G.
Tomic B.
7-626-756-1
R16
Galarneau A.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
7-626-0
Heide G.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Walton A.
Statham J.
6-26-0
Nishikori K.
Krueger M.[7]
4-66-36-2
Tomic B.
Sweeny D.[5]
6-47-63
Draxl L.
Sinclair C.
7-606-3
Zhukayev B.
Zhu E.
4-67-56-2
Zheng M.
Copil M.
6-16-3
R32
Krueger M.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
4-66-46-4
Nishikori K.
Langmo C.
6-26-4
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
7-616-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Yevseyev D.
5-76-47-5
Rybakov A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
7-646-3
Heide G.
Schoolkate T.
7-636-3
Tomic B.
Bolt A.
7-676-4
Sweeny D.[5]
Mansouri S.
4-67-56-2
Statham J.
Chappell N.
6-16-747-5
Zheng M.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-36-4
Draxl L.
Wu T.[1]
3-67-57-64
Zhu E.
Durasovic V.
7-646-4
Galarneau A.[8]
Kypson P.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Escoffier A.[4]
7-656-4