Kaito Uesugi vs Calum Puttergill — Palmas Del Mar CH Qualifying Round 1

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JPN
Kaito Uesugi
#1471ATP
31 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
AUS
Calum Puttergill
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLW
Uesugi K.
6-3 6-1
Puttergill C.
Uesugi K.
662
Puttergill C.
310

Kaito Uesugi defeated Calum Puttergill 6-3 6-1 in the Palmas Del Mar CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uesugi K.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Puttergill C.

Puttergill C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Uesugi K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uesugi K.Puttergill C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
51%
50%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Uesugi K.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 119 days (−1.5)
Puttergill C.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.2
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Zheng M.
Rodrigues D.
6-36-1
Heide G.[10]
Copil M.[1]
6-36-4
Tomic B.[6]
Kirchheimer S.[7]
7-53-66-3
Zhu E.[2]
Rybakov A.[8]
7-654-66-3
Sinclair C.[9]
Uesugi K.
6-17-64
Chappell N.[3]
Hallquist Lithen J.
4-66-36-3
Q1
Zhu E.[2]
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5
Rodrigues D.
Boitan G.[12]
6-27-5
Sinclair C.[9]
Wiersholm H.
6-26-1
Tomic B.[6]
Young D.
6-46-2
Chappell N.[3]
Boyer T.
7-636-2
Heide G.[10]
Nam J.
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.[7]
Brymer G.
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Ponwith N.[5]
6-47-66
Uesugi K.
Puttergill C.
6-36-1
Hallquist Lithen J.
Alves M.[11]
0-66-34-1
Rybakov A.[8]
Perez A.
5-76-16-2
Copil M.[1]
Evans G.
5-77-633-0
Zhu E.
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5