Celine Naef vs Venus Williams — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
SUI
Celine Naef
#194WTA
1671ELO
1632Grass ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
grass
Venus Williams
USA
Venus Williams
1654ELO
1576Grass ELO
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Naef C.
3-6 7-6 6-2
Williams V.
Naef C.
37762
Williams V.
66321

Celine Naef defeated Venus Williams 3-6 7-6 6-2 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Williams V.

Williams V.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Serve advantage — Naef C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Williams V.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
36%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
52%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
48%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Naef C.Williams V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
54
Break points saved·Even
81
83
Break points won·Even
87
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
30
Tiebreaks·
—
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Williams V.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 161 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.9+56 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Grass Elo 1576
4.8Overall Elo 1671
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1654
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.8
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Williams V.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Naef C.: 19 days rest · Williams V.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[1]
4-66-47-63
Semi-finals
Alexandrova E.[1]
Sasnovich A.[7]
6-17-61
Kudermetova V.[1]
Hruncakova V.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Sasnovich A.[7]
Samsonova L.[2]
7-643-1
Kudermetova V.[1]
Naef C.
6-36-2
Hruncakova V.
Krueger A.
6-46-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bektas E.
6-46-4
R16
Sasnovich A.[7]
Minnen G.
6-24-66-3
Naef C.
Mcnally C.[8]
3-66-46-3
Bektas E.
Vickery S.
6-46-4
Kudermetova V.[1]
Zhao C.
6-16-3
Krueger A.
Azarenka V.[3]
6-36-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Kudermetova P.
6-46-1
Alexandrova E.[1]
Birrell K.
6-47-63
Hruncakova V.
Andreescu B.
7-666-3
R32
Kudermetova V.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-33-0
Minnen G.
Ponchet J.
7-54-66-2
Vickery S.
Hon P.
6-36-0
Naef C.
Williams V.
3-67-636-2
Zhao C.
Bonaventure Y.
7-637-64
Alexandrova E.[1]
Rodina E.
6-36-4
Azarenka V.[3]
Stevanovic N.
7-656-3
Krueger A.
Peterson R.
6-16-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Rueffer L.
7-56-757-63
Hruncakova V.
Bandecchi S.
6-46-2
Bektas E.
Galfi D.
7-57-61
Birrell K.
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-4
Andreescu B.
Sonmez Z.
6-46-4
Sasnovich A.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-06-3
Mcnally C.[8]
Volynets K.
6-26-1
Kudermetova P.
Yuan Y.[4]
6-46-3