Veronika Kudermetova vs Celine Naef — s Hertogenbosch Quarter-final

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Quarter-final
Veronika Kudermetova
RUS1
Veronika Kudermetova
#115WTA
1836ELO
1710Grass ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
grass
SUI
Celine Naef
#194WTA
1671ELO
1632Grass ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
Kudermetova V.
6-3 6-2
Naef C.
Kudermetova V.
662
Naef C.
320

Veronika Kudermetova defeated Celine Naef 6-3 6-2 in the s Hertogenbosch quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Veronika Kudermetova came in ranked #115, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudermetova V.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Naef C.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kudermetova V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudermetova V.Naef C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
53%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudermetova V.Naef C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
85
72
Break points saved·Even
85
81
Break points won·Even
85
87
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
73
Tiebreaks·
96
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudermetova V.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Naef C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
6.6+78 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Grass Elo 1632
7.4Overall Elo 1836
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1671
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudermetova V.Naef C.
Freshness·
—
100

Naef C.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[1]
4-66-47-63
Semi-finals
Alexandrova E.[1]
Sasnovich A.[7]
6-17-61
Kudermetova V.[1]
Hruncakova V.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Sasnovich A.[7]
Samsonova L.[2]
7-643-1
Kudermetova V.[1]
Naef C.
6-36-2
Hruncakova V.
Krueger A.
6-46-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bektas E.
6-46-4
R16
Sasnovich A.[7]
Minnen G.
6-24-66-3
Naef C.
Mcnally C.[8]
3-66-46-3
Bektas E.
Vickery S.
6-46-4
Kudermetova V.[1]
Zhao C.
6-16-3
Krueger A.
Azarenka V.[3]
6-36-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Kudermetova P.
6-46-1
Alexandrova E.[1]
Birrell K.
6-47-63
Hruncakova V.
Andreescu B.
7-666-3
R32
Kudermetova V.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-33-0
Minnen G.
Ponchet J.
7-54-66-2
Vickery S.
Hon P.
6-36-0
Naef C.
Williams V.
3-67-636-2
Zhao C.
Bonaventure Y.
7-637-64
Alexandrova E.[1]
Rodina E.
6-36-4
Azarenka V.[3]
Stevanovic N.
7-656-3
Krueger A.
Peterson R.
6-16-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Rueffer L.
7-56-757-63
Hruncakova V.
Bandecchi S.
6-46-2
Bektas E.
Galfi D.
7-57-61
Birrell K.
Pattinama Kerkhove L.
6-16-4
Andreescu B.
Sonmez Z.
6-46-4
Sasnovich A.[7]
Stefanini L.
6-06-3
Mcnally C.[8]
Volynets K.
6-26-1
Kudermetova P.
Yuan Y.[4]
6-46-3