Bernard Tomic vs Strong Kirchheimer — Palmas Del Mar CH Qualifying Round 2

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Bernard Tomic
AUS6
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
Strong Kirchheimer
USA7
Strong Kirchheimer
#634ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWLLW
Tomic B.
7-5 3-6 6-3
Kirchheimer S.
Tomic B.
7362
Kirchheimer S.
5631

Bernard Tomic defeated Strong Kirchheimer 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the Palmas Del Mar CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Kirchheimer S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Kirchheimer S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Kirchheimer S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
5
Break points saved·Dominant
92
63
Break points won·Even
4
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kirchheimer S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Kirchheimer S.
Freshness·
78
—

Tomic B.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Zheng M.
Rodrigues D.
6-36-1
Heide G.[10]
Copil M.[1]
6-36-4
Tomic B.[6]
Kirchheimer S.[7]
7-53-66-3
Zhu E.[2]
Rybakov A.[8]
7-654-66-3
Sinclair C.[9]
Uesugi K.
6-17-64
Chappell N.[3]
Hallquist Lithen J.
4-66-36-3
Q1
Zhu E.[2]
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5
Rodrigues D.
Boitan G.[12]
6-27-5
Sinclair C.[9]
Wiersholm H.
6-26-1
Tomic B.[6]
Young D.
6-46-2
Chappell N.[3]
Boyer T.
7-636-2
Heide G.[10]
Nam J.
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.[7]
Brymer G.
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Ponwith N.[5]
6-47-66
Uesugi K.
Puttergill C.
6-36-1
Hallquist Lithen J.
Alves M.[11]
0-66-34-1
Rybakov A.[8]
Perez A.
5-76-16-2
Copil M.[1]
Evans G.
5-77-633-0
Zhu E.
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5