Fernando Verdasco vs Cem Ilkel — Bratislava CH Round of 32

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP
Fernando Verdasco
42 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Verdasco F.
7-5 6-4
Ilkel C.
Verdasco F.
762
Ilkel C.
540

Fernando Verdasco defeated Cem Ilkel 7-5 6-4 in the Bratislava CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Cem Ilkel came in defending last year's semi-final, but Fernando Verdasco had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Verdasco F.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Verdasco F.

Serve advantage — Ilkel C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Verdasco F.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Verdasco F.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
32
Break points saved·Dominant
96
49
Break points won·Dominant
40
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
65
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Verdasco F.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Sachko V.
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-27-62
Diallo G.
De Loore J.
6-07-5
Semi-finals
Sachko V.
Barrios Vera T.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Molcan A.[1]
6-06-1
De Loore J.
Nardi L.
7-57-65
Diallo G.
Damm M.
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.
Mensik J.
4-66-16-3
Sachko V.
Coria F.[3]
4-67-56-3
Kuzmanov D.
Kym J.
7-56-4
Molcan A.[1]
Machac T.[5]
7-653-66-1
Damm M.
Cressy M.[7]
6-47-66
Diallo G.
Klein L.
3-67-656-2
De Loore J.
Marchenko I.
6-33-67-62
Nardi L.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-0
R16
Barrios Vera T.
Neumayer L.
5-76-36-3
Mensik J.
Verdasco F.
6-16-4
Sachko V.
Marchenko I.
7-56-1
Kym J.
Gombos N.[6]
6-36-767-67
Kuzmanov D.
Piros Z.[4]
6-32-66-4
Machac T.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-46-0
Molcan A.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-47-5
Coria F.[3]
Safwat M.
6-736-26-4
Cressy M.[7]
Martineau M.
7-646-3
Marchenko I.
Gombos N.
4-66-37-5
De Loore J.
Hassan B.
6-36-4
Klein L.
Virtanen O.
6-46-4
Nardi L.
Paulson A.
5-76-46-3
Diallo G.
Thiem D.[1]
6-14-67-65
Dzumhur D.
Piros Z.[6]
6-36-1
Damm M.
Ivanovski K.
6-36-4
R32
Mensik J.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-43-66-1
Verdasco F.
Ilkel C.
7-56-4
Kuzmanov D.
Melzer G.
6-26-3
Piros Z.[4]
Nagal S.
6-27-5
Kolar Z.
Zuk K.
4-67-56-2
Coppejans K.
Privara P.
1-67-646-1
Kym J.
Laaksonen H.
6-27-63
Neumayer L.
Dzumhur D.
6-766-16-4
Barrios Vera T.
Klein L.[7]
1-67-56-0
Coria F.[3]
Michalski D.
6-06-2
Safwat M.
Pokorny L.
2-67-666-4
Marchenko I.
Prizmic D.
6-26-4
Gombos N.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-33-66-4
Machac T.[5]
Bonadio R.
6-46-766-2
Molcan A.[1]
Burruchaga R.
4-66-26-3
Sachko V.
Kovalik J.[8]
7-615-76-0
Ivanovski K.
Gojowczyk P.
7-636-2
Martineau M.
Mensik J.
4-66-46-1
De Loore J.
Molcan A.[8]
5-76-46-3
Nardi L.
Stricker D.[2]
7-646-3
Dzumhur D.
Zeppieri G.
6-26-0
Thiem D.[1]
Sachko V.
7-656-3
Paulson A.
Boitan G.
6-46-3
Gombos N.
Bonzi B.[3]
6-47-65
Diallo G.
Fery A.
7-56-1
Damm M.
Santillan A.
6-33-66-3
Marchenko I.
Novak D.
7-666-0
Klein L.
Prizmic D.
6-06-3
Cressy M.[7]
Pokorny L.
7-646-3
Piros Z.[6]
Misolic F.
7-53-66-3
Hassan B.
Travaglia S.
6-36-2
Virtanen O.
Broady L.[5]
7-651-66-2