Gustavo Heide vs Bernard Tomic — Palmas Del Mar CH Quarter-final

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BRA
Gustavo Heide
#136ATP
1695ELO
1536Hard ELO
$167kYTD
$609kCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Heide G.
7-6 6-7 6-1
Tomic B.
Heide G.
776562
Tomic B.
627711

Gustavo Heide defeated Bernard Tomic 7-6 6-7 6-1 in the Palmas Del Mar CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Gustavo Heide came in ranked #136.

Key context

  • Match story: Gustavo Heide came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Heide G.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Heide G.

Serve advantage — Heide G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Heide G.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Heide G.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
53
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Slight edge
10
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
63
74
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
88
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Heide G.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+95 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1441
6.5Overall Elo 1695
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
7.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Heide G.Tomic B.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
84

Heide G.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nishikori K.
Zheng M.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Nishikori K.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-37-64
Quarter-finals
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Galarneau A.[8]
6-30-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Draxl L.
6-46-3
Heide G.
Tomic B.
7-626-756-1
R16
Galarneau A.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
7-626-0
Heide G.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Walton A.
Statham J.
6-26-0
Nishikori K.
Krueger M.[7]
4-66-36-2
Tomic B.
Sweeny D.[5]
6-47-63
Draxl L.
Sinclair C.
7-606-3
Zhukayev B.
Zhu E.
4-67-56-2
Zheng M.
Copil M.
6-16-3
R32
Krueger M.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
4-66-46-4
Nishikori K.
Langmo C.
6-26-4
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
7-616-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Yevseyev D.
5-76-47-5
Rybakov A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
7-646-3
Heide G.
Schoolkate T.
7-636-3
Tomic B.
Bolt A.
7-676-4
Sweeny D.[5]
Mansouri S.
4-67-56-2
Statham J.
Chappell N.
6-16-747-5
Zheng M.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-36-4
Draxl L.
Wu T.[1]
3-67-57-64
Zhu E.
Durasovic V.
7-646-4
Galarneau A.[8]
Kypson P.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Escoffier A.[4]
7-656-4