Tallon Griekspoor vs Jordan Thompson — s Hertogenbosch Final

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Final
Tallon Griekspoor
NED6
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1721Grass ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
grass
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Griekspoor T.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Thompson J.
Griekspoor T.
647762
Thompson J.
776331

Tallon Griekspoor defeated Jordan Thompson 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the s Hertogenbosch final on grass. The result followed the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in ranked #57, defending last year's round of 16. Tallon Griekspoor extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-02Shanghai MastersR64hardTallon Griekspoor6-3 6-2
2022-11-22Davis Cup Finals QF: AUS vs NEDRRhardJordan Thompson4-6 7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Griekspoor T.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Griekspoor T.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.6
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Griekspoor T.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
70
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Slight edge
34
24
Deciding sets·Even
94
91
Tiebreaks·Even
97
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Griekspoor T.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Thompson J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+12 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Grass Elo 1709
5.6Overall Elo 1789
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1772
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
6.1
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
4.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
2.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Griekspoor T.Thompson J.
Freshness·
96
—

Griekspoor T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[6]
Thompson J.
6-747-636-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[6]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
Hijikata R.
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Griekspoor T.[6]
De Minaur A.[2]
4-66-36-4
Thompson J.
Mannarino A.
5-77-626-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Sinner J.[2]
6-36-4
Hijikata R.
Mcdonald M.
5-76-36-1
R16
Sinner J.[2]
Bublik A.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Humbert U.[5]
6-26-766-4
Hijikata R.
Huesler M.
2-67-56-3
Mannarino A.
Medvedev D.[3]
4-66-46-2
Thompson J.
Raonic M.
7-646-1
Griekspoor T.[6]
Popyrin A.
6-36-2
Mcdonald M.
Coric B.[3]
6-46-4
De Minaur A.[2]
Djere L.
6-16-756-3
R32
Raonic M.
Kecmanovic M.[5]
6-36-4
Djere L.
Berankis R.
6-46-2
Thompson J.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-63
Hijikata R.
Brouwer G.
6-756-36-2
Bublik A.
Goffin D.
7-57-5
Popyrin A.
Rinderknech A.[4]
6-37-66
Ruusuvuori E.
Nakashima B.
6-33-66-3
Mcdonald M.
Ivashka I.
6-46-3
Mannarino A.
Fils A.
7-616-4
Huesler M.
Cressy M.[8]
6-27-62
Humbert U.[5]
Kubler J.
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.[6]
Ymer M.
6-23-66-3