Magdalena Frech vs Lin Zhu — Nottingham Round of 16

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 16
Magdalena Frech
POL
Magdalena Frech
#44WTA
1725ELO
1555Grass ELO
$659kYTD
$4.8MCAREER
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
grass
Lin Zhu
CHN8
Lin Zhu
#130WTA
1674ELO
1545Grass ELO
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Frech M.
6-2 6-4
Zhu L.
Frech M.
662
Zhu L.
240

Magdalena Frech defeated Lin Zhu 6-2 6-4 in the Nottingham round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Magdalena Frech came in ranked #44, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Frech M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zhu L.

Zhu L.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Frech M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Frech M.Zhu L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Frech M.Zhu L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
55
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
64
Break points won·Clear edge
71
91
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Frech M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Zhu L.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.5+9 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Grass Elo 1545
5.9Overall Elo 1725
ELO gap
4.1Overall Elo 1674
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Frech M.Zhu L.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Frech M.: 15 days rest · Zhu L.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Burrage J.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Burrage J.
Cornet A.
7-57-5
Boulter K.
Watson H.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Burrage J.
Frech M.
6-23-67-5
Watson H.
Golubic V.
7-627-5
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-37-5
Cornet A.
Mandlik E.
6-34-66-3
R16
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-07-5
Mandlik E.
Giorgi C.[7]
7-55-76-3
Boulter K.
Snigur D.
7-56-3
Golubic V.
Vekic D.[4]
6-46-1
Cornet A.
Sakkari M.[6]
6-16-4
Watson H.
Maria T.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Zhu L.[8]
6-26-4
Burrage J.
Linette M.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Zhu L.[8]
Parks A.
7-656-2
Watson H.
Niemeier J.
6-46-3
Cornet A.
Swan K.
2-66-16-4
Vekic D.[4]
Bucsa C.
6-24-66-1
Frech M.
Kartal S.
6-35-76-2
Golubic V.
Teichmann J.
6-46-3
Snigur D.
Haddad Maia B.[2]
6-46-3
Mandlik E.
Tomova V.
6-23-67-65
Kalinina A.[5]
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-56-3
Dart H.
Marino R.
6-46-2
Giorgi C.[7]
Brengle M.
7-656-2
Linette M.[3]
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
Boulter K.
Appleton E.
6-16-3
Sakkari M.[6]
Wang X.
6-27-66
Maria T.
Zhang S.[6]
6-16-4
Burrage J.
Martincova T.
7-653-67-64