Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Borna Coric — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 16
Mackenzie Mcdonald
USAQ
Mackenzie Mcdonald
#140ATP
1606ELO
1541Grass ELO
$240kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
grass
CRO3
Borna Coric
#855ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Mcdonald M.
6-4 6-4
Coric B.
Mcdonald M.
662
Coric B.
440

Mackenzie Mcdonald defeated Borna Coric 6-4 6-4 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Mackenzie Mcdonald came in ranked #140, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Mackenzie Mcdonald extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Mackenzie Mcdonald edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-08Australian OpenR64hardMackenzie Mcdonald6-4 6-2 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mcdonald M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Coric B.

Coric B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Mcdonald M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mcdonald M.Coric B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.8
5.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcdonald M.Coric B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
71
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Dominant
66
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mcdonald M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Coric B.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
7.0
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
2.7
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
0.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mcdonald M.Coric B.
Freshness·
91
—

Mcdonald M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[6]
Thompson J.
6-747-636-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[6]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
Hijikata R.
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Griekspoor T.[6]
De Minaur A.[2]
4-66-36-4
Thompson J.
Mannarino A.
5-77-626-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Sinner J.[2]
6-36-4
Hijikata R.
Mcdonald M.
5-76-36-1
R16
Sinner J.[2]
Bublik A.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Humbert U.[5]
6-26-766-4
Hijikata R.
Huesler M.
2-67-56-3
Mannarino A.
Medvedev D.[3]
4-66-46-2
Thompson J.
Raonic M.
7-646-1
Griekspoor T.[6]
Popyrin A.
6-36-2
Mcdonald M.
Coric B.[3]
6-46-4
De Minaur A.[2]
Djere L.
6-16-756-3
R32
Raonic M.
Kecmanovic M.[5]
6-36-4
Djere L.
Berankis R.
6-46-2
Thompson J.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-63
Hijikata R.
Brouwer G.
6-756-36-2
Bublik A.
Goffin D.
7-57-5
Popyrin A.
Rinderknech A.[4]
6-37-66
Ruusuvuori E.
Nakashima B.
6-33-66-3
Mcdonald M.
Ivashka I.
6-46-3
Mannarino A.
Fils A.
7-616-4
Huesler M.
Cressy M.[8]
6-27-62
Humbert U.[5]
Kubler J.
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.[6]
Ymer M.
6-23-66-3