Michael Zheng vs Marius Copil — Palmas Del Mar CH Round of 16

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Michael Zheng
#121ATP
1695ELO
1672Hard ELO
$310kYTD
$502kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Zheng M.
6-1 6-3
Copil M.
Zheng M.
662
Copil M.
130

Michael Zheng defeated Marius Copil 6-1 6-3 in the Palmas Del Mar CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zheng M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng M.Copil M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
8.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Copil M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
5.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng M.Copil M.
Freshness·
92
—

Zheng M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nishikori K.
Zheng M.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Nishikori K.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-37-64
Quarter-finals
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Galarneau A.[8]
6-30-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Draxl L.
6-46-3
Heide G.
Tomic B.
7-626-756-1
R16
Galarneau A.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
7-626-0
Heide G.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Walton A.
Statham J.
6-26-0
Nishikori K.
Krueger M.[7]
4-66-36-2
Tomic B.
Sweeny D.[5]
6-47-63
Draxl L.
Sinclair C.
7-606-3
Zhukayev B.
Zhu E.
4-67-56-2
Zheng M.
Copil M.
6-16-3
R32
Krueger M.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
4-66-46-4
Nishikori K.
Langmo C.
6-26-4
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
7-616-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Yevseyev D.
5-76-47-5
Rybakov A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
7-646-3
Heide G.
Schoolkate T.
7-636-3
Tomic B.
Bolt A.
7-676-4
Sweeny D.[5]
Mansouri S.
4-67-56-2
Statham J.
Chappell N.
6-16-747-5
Zheng M.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-36-4
Draxl L.
Wu T.[1]
3-67-57-64
Zhu E.
Durasovic V.
7-646-4
Galarneau A.[8]
Kypson P.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Escoffier A.[4]
7-656-4