Marius Copil vs Antoine Escoffier — Palmas Del Mar CH Round of 32

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
FRA4
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Copil M.
7-6 6-4
Escoffier A.
Copil M.
7762
Escoffier A.
6540

Marius Copil defeated Antoine Escoffier 7-6 6-4 in the Palmas Del Mar CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (65 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
68
Break points won·Clear edge
3
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escoffier A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.2
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
4.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nishikori K.
Zheng M.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Nishikori K.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-37-64
Quarter-finals
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Zheng M.
Galarneau A.[8]
6-30-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Draxl L.
6-46-3
Heide G.
Tomic B.
7-626-756-1
R16
Galarneau A.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
7-626-0
Heide G.
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Walton A.
Statham J.
6-26-0
Nishikori K.
Krueger M.[7]
4-66-36-2
Tomic B.
Sweeny D.[5]
6-47-63
Draxl L.
Sinclair C.
7-606-3
Zhukayev B.
Zhu E.
4-67-56-2
Zheng M.
Copil M.
6-16-3
R32
Krueger M.[7]
Gojowczyk P.
4-66-46-4
Nishikori K.
Langmo C.
6-26-4
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
7-616-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Yevseyev D.
5-76-47-5
Rybakov A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
7-646-3
Heide G.
Schoolkate T.
7-636-3
Tomic B.
Bolt A.
7-676-4
Sweeny D.[5]
Mansouri S.
4-67-56-2
Statham J.
Chappell N.
6-16-747-5
Zheng M.
Diez S.
6-36-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-36-4
Draxl L.
Wu T.[1]
3-67-57-64
Zhu E.
Durasovic V.
7-646-4
Galarneau A.[8]
Kypson P.
6-36-0
Copil M.
Escoffier A.[4]
7-656-4