Nick Chappell vs John Hallquist Lithen — Palmas Del Mar CH Qualifying Round 2

Palmas Del Mar CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA3
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
hard
SWE
John Hallquist Lithen
#772ATP
24 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLL
Chappell N.
4-6 6-3 6-3
Hallquist Lithen J.
Chappell N.
4662
Hallquist Lithen J.
6331

Nick Chappell defeated John Hallquist Lithen 4-6 6-3 6-3 in the Palmas Del Mar CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chappell N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hallquist Lithen J.

Hallquist Lithen J.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Serve advantage — Hallquist Lithen J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Chappell N.Hallquist Lithen J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
42%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
67%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (57 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chappell N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hallquist Lithen J.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1428 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Zheng M.
Rodrigues D.
6-36-1
Heide G.[10]
Copil M.[1]
6-36-4
Tomic B.[6]
Kirchheimer S.[7]
7-53-66-3
Zhu E.[2]
Rybakov A.[8]
7-654-66-3
Sinclair C.[9]
Uesugi K.
6-17-64
Chappell N.[3]
Hallquist Lithen J.
4-66-36-3
Q1
Zhu E.[2]
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5
Rodrigues D.
Boitan G.[12]
6-27-5
Sinclair C.[9]
Wiersholm H.
6-26-1
Tomic B.[6]
Young D.
6-46-2
Chappell N.[3]
Boyer T.
7-636-2
Heide G.[10]
Nam J.
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.[7]
Brymer G.
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Ponwith N.[5]
6-47-66
Uesugi K.
Puttergill C.
6-36-1
Hallquist Lithen J.
Alves M.[11]
0-66-34-1
Rybakov A.[8]
Perez A.
5-76-16-2
Copil M.[1]
Evans G.
5-77-633-0
Zhu E.
Mccormick T.
4-66-37-5