Pedro Cachin vs Nerman Fatic — Perugia CH Quarter-final

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ARG1
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 12 June 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Cachin P.
6-3 3-0
Fatic N.
Cachin P.
63–
Fatic N.
30–

Pedro Cachin advanced when Nerman Fatic retired 6-3 3-0 in the Perugia CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Even
22
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
63
Break points won·Clear edge
21
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
11
24
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
46
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cachin P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fatic N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.2
Surface form
4.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[7]
Lavagno E.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Lavagno E.
Muller A.[5]
4-66-36-2
Marozsan F.[7]
Cachin P.[1]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Cachin P.[1]
Fatic N.
6-33-0
Marozsan F.[7]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Muller A.[5]
Munar J.[3]
5-76-46-2
Lavagno E.
Brancaccio R.
6-26-3
R16
Cachin P.[1]
Collarini A.
6-13-1
Muller A.[5]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-36-1
Brancaccio R.
Ramos A.[2]
5-77-646-2
Lavagno E.
Roca Batalla O.
6-727-57-5
Fatic N.
Gigante M.
4-67-646-3
Munar J.[3]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-2
Marozsan F.[7]
Lopez San Martin A.
6-26-3
Maestrelli F.
Travaglia S.
6-37-5
R32
Brancaccio R.
Ionel N.
6-26-1
Pellegrino A.
Passaro F.
7-636-3
Lopez San Martin A.
Trungelliti M.
6-44-67-66
Gigante M.
Giannessi A.
6-31-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Giustino L.
6-36-3
Muller A.[5]
Darderi L.
6-43-66-1
Marozsan F.[7]
Agamenone F.
6-47-64
Ramos A.[2]
Gaio F.
6-26-2
Lavagno E.
Weis A.
6-37-64
Roca Batalla O.
Bagnis F.[8]
6-36-4
Maestrelli F.
Olivo R.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Thiem D.[4]
2-67-666-1
Fatic N.
Zeppieri G.
7-642-66-1
Collarini A.
Popko D.
6-33-66-3
Cachin P.[1]
Ferrari G.
6-46-4
Munar J.[3]
Arnaboldi A.
6-06-4