Jodie Burrage vs Alize Cornet — Nottingham Semi-final

Nottingham · WTA · Semi-final
Jodie Burrage
GBR
Jodie Burrage
#920WTA
1484ELO
1433Grass ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 June 2023
grass
FRA
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Burrage J.
7-5 7-5
Cornet A.
Burrage J.
772
Cornet A.
550

Jodie Burrage defeated Alize Cornet 7-5 7-5 in the Nottingham semi-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Jodie Burrage came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Burrage J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Cornet A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Burrage J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burrage J.Cornet A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
54%
Return points won·Even
41%
45%
Break points saved·Even
53%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burrage J.Cornet A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
44
57
Break points won·Clear edge
65
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
4
74
Tiebreaks·Even
46
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burrage J.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 273 days (−1.5)
Cornet A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Boulter K.
Burrage J.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Burrage J.
Cornet A.
7-57-5
Boulter K.
Watson H.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Burrage J.
Frech M.
6-23-67-5
Watson H.
Golubic V.
7-627-5
Boulter K.
Dart H.
6-37-5
Cornet A.
Mandlik E.
6-34-66-3
R16
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-07-5
Mandlik E.
Giorgi C.[7]
7-55-76-3
Boulter K.
Snigur D.
7-56-3
Golubic V.
Vekic D.[4]
6-46-1
Cornet A.
Sakkari M.[6]
6-16-4
Watson H.
Maria T.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Zhu L.[8]
6-26-4
Burrage J.
Linette M.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Zhu L.[8]
Parks A.
7-656-2
Watson H.
Niemeier J.
6-46-3
Cornet A.
Swan K.
2-66-16-4
Vekic D.[4]
Bucsa C.
6-24-66-1
Frech M.
Kartal S.
6-35-76-2
Golubic V.
Teichmann J.
6-46-3
Snigur D.
Haddad Maia B.[2]
6-46-3
Mandlik E.
Tomova V.
6-23-67-65
Kalinina A.[5]
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-56-3
Dart H.
Marino R.
6-46-2
Giorgi C.[7]
Brengle M.
7-656-2
Linette M.[3]
Gadecki O.
6-46-4
Boulter K.
Appleton E.
6-16-3
Sakkari M.[6]
Wang X.
6-27-66
Maria T.
Zhang S.[6]
6-16-4
Burrage J.
Martincova T.
7-653-67-64