Adam Neff vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Tyler CH Round of 32

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Adam Neff
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
hard
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1359Hard ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Neff A.
4-6 6-2 6-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Neff A.
4662
Reis Da Silva J.
6231

Adam Neff defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Tyler CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Neff A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Neff A.

Serve advantage — Reis Da Silva J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Neff A.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
50%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Neff A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 483 days (−1.5)
Reis Da Silva J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-787-606-4
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.
Mansouri S.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Sandgren T.
7-54-66-3
Gojowczyk P.
Neff A.
3-66-36-2
R16
Neff A.
Langmo C.
7-647-66
Sandgren T.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Galarneau A.
Wu T.[2]
6-26-786-4
Mansouri S.
Dougaz A.[6]
7-641-67-610
Kukushkin M.
Polmans M.[4]
2-66-46-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-2
Gojowczyk P.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Shimizu Y.
Bolt A.
7-656-3
R32
Langmo C.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-647-66
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Yevseyev D.
7-626-2
Shimizu Y.
Copil M.
6-26-1
Bolt A.
Ficovich J.[8]
6-16-4
Chappell N.
Kumar O.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.
Walton A.
4-66-37-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[5]
6-26-4
Neff A.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-26-3
Mansouri S.
Sweeny D.
6-26-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Diez S.
6-26-3
Dougaz A.[6]
Zhukayev B.
7-56-2
Wu T.[2]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-0
Polmans M.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2