Adam Neff vs Christian Langmo — Tyler CH Round of 16

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Adam Neff
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Neff A.
7-6 7-6
Langmo C.
Neff A.
77782
Langmo C.
64660

Adam Neff defeated Christian Langmo 7-6 7-6 in the Tyler CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Neff A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Neff A.

Serve advantage — Langmo C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Neff A.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
51%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
65%
Aces / match·Even
8.1
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Neff A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 483 days (−1.5)
Langmo C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Neff A.Langmo C.
Freshness·
—
65

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-787-606-4
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.
Mansouri S.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Sandgren T.
7-54-66-3
Gojowczyk P.
Neff A.
3-66-36-2
R16
Neff A.
Langmo C.
7-647-66
Sandgren T.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Galarneau A.
Wu T.[2]
6-26-786-4
Mansouri S.
Dougaz A.[6]
7-641-67-610
Kukushkin M.
Polmans M.[4]
2-66-46-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-2
Gojowczyk P.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Shimizu Y.
Bolt A.
7-656-3
R32
Langmo C.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-647-66
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Yevseyev D.
7-626-2
Shimizu Y.
Copil M.
6-26-1
Bolt A.
Ficovich J.[8]
6-16-4
Chappell N.
Kumar O.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.
Walton A.
4-66-37-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[5]
6-26-4
Neff A.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-26-3
Mansouri S.
Sweeny D.
6-26-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Diez S.
6-26-3
Dougaz A.[6]
Zhukayev B.
7-56-2
Wu T.[2]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-0
Polmans M.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2