Christian Langmo vs Michael Mmoh — Tyler CH Round of 32

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA1
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Langmo C.
6-3 7-6
Mmoh M.
Langmo C.
6772
Mmoh M.
3620

Christian Langmo defeated Michael Mmoh 6-3 7-6 in the Tyler CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Langmo C.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.7
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Langmo C.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
66
Break points saved·Even
88
91
Break points won·Dominant
1
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Langmo C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.7Hard Elo 1254
Surface ELO
9.3+345 Hard Elo edge
0.6Overall Elo 1267
ELO gap
9.4Overall Elo 1613
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
5.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
9.1
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Langmo C.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Dominant
65
95

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d) · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-787-606-4
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.
Mansouri S.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Sandgren T.
7-54-66-3
Gojowczyk P.
Neff A.
3-66-36-2
R16
Neff A.
Langmo C.
7-647-66
Sandgren T.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Galarneau A.
Wu T.[2]
6-26-786-4
Mansouri S.
Dougaz A.[6]
7-641-67-610
Kukushkin M.
Polmans M.[4]
2-66-46-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-2
Gojowczyk P.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Shimizu Y.
Bolt A.
7-656-3
R32
Langmo C.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-647-66
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Yevseyev D.
7-626-2
Shimizu Y.
Copil M.
6-26-1
Bolt A.
Ficovich J.[8]
6-16-4
Chappell N.
Kumar O.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.
Walton A.
4-66-37-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[5]
6-26-4
Neff A.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-26-3
Mansouri S.
Sweeny D.
6-26-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Diez S.
6-26-3
Dougaz A.[6]
Zhukayev B.
7-56-2
Wu T.[2]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-0
Polmans M.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2