Daniel Elahi Galan vs Cem Ilkel — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL3
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
clay
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Galan D.
6-4 7-6
Ilkel C.
Galan D.
6772
Ilkel C.
4630

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Cem Ilkel 6-4 7-6 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Daniel Elahi Galan came in ranked #304, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Daniel Elahi Galan extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-17Davis Cup WG1 R1: COL vs TURRRclayDaniel Elahi Galan6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Even
5.3
4.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
32
Break points saved·Dominant
92
49
Break points won·Clear edge
21
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
70
Tiebreaks·Even
66
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galan D.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.0
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Arnaldi M.[5]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-646-1
Semi-finals
Arnaldi M.[5]
Martinez P.
7-647-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Molleker R.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Arnaldi M.[5]
Munar J.[2]
1-66-47-5
Molleker R.
Galan D.[3]
6-45-77-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Santillan A.
7-56-3
Martinez P.
Kotov P.[8]
6-44-67-63
R16
Arnaldi M.[5]
Topo M.
2-66-36-1
Munar J.[2]
Skatov T.
6-27-5
Kotov P.[8]
Added D.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.
5-76-06-2
Martinez P.
Thiem D.[4]
2-66-36-1
Santillan A.
Kovalik J.
6-23-66-3
Molleker R.
Marozsan F.[6]
7-56-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Janvier M.
6-13-67-65
R32
Added D.
Rehberg M.
6-25-4
Munar J.[2]
Dellien H.
6-16-1
Thiem D.[4]
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Molleker R.
Fanselow S.
6-46-756-1
Martinez P.
Squire H.
6-46-2
Galan D.[3]
Ilkel C.
6-47-63
Arnaldi M.[5]
Gombos N.
7-56-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Kym J.
7-626-3
Kovalik J.
Marterer M.
3-66-27-65
Diaz Acosta F.
Otte O.[7]
6-46-716-1
Santillan A.
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-56-3
Topo M.
Krutykh O.
6-46-4
Kotov P.[8]
Pellegrino A.
7-666-2
Skatov T.
Dzumhur D.
7-56-1
Marozsan F.[6]
Casanova H.
6-36-4
Janvier M.
Gerch L.
6-46-3