Mark Lajal vs Antoine Escoffier — Tyler CH Round of 32

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
hard
FRA5
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Lajal M.
6-2 6-4
Escoffier A.
Lajal M.
662
Escoffier A.
240

Mark Lajal defeated Antoine Escoffier 6-2 6-4 in the Tyler CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.8
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lajal M.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
68
Break points won·Slight edge
13
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Escoffier A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+143 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1413
6.8Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1436
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
9.2
Surface form
6.3
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
5.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Escoffier A.
Freshness·
88
—

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-787-606-4
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Galarneau A.
6-44-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.
Mansouri S.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Shimizu Y.
4-66-36-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Sandgren T.
7-54-66-3
Gojowczyk P.
Neff A.
3-66-36-2
R16
Neff A.
Langmo C.
7-647-66
Sandgren T.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Galarneau A.
Wu T.[2]
6-26-786-4
Mansouri S.
Dougaz A.[6]
7-641-67-610
Kukushkin M.
Polmans M.[4]
2-66-46-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-46-2
Gojowczyk P.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Shimizu Y.
Bolt A.
7-656-3
R32
Langmo C.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-62
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-647-66
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.
Heide G.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Yevseyev D.
7-626-2
Shimizu Y.
Copil M.
6-26-1
Bolt A.
Ficovich J.[8]
6-16-4
Chappell N.
Kumar O.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.
Walton A.
4-66-37-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[5]
6-26-4
Neff A.
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-26-3
Mansouri S.
Sweeny D.
6-26-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Diez S.
6-26-3
Dougaz A.[6]
Zhukayev B.
7-56-2
Wu T.[2]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-0
Polmans M.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Gojowczyk P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2