Constant Lestienne vs Daniel Cox — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA6
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 June 2023
grass
GBR
Daniel Cox
35 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLWLW
Lestienne C.
3-6 6-3 7-5
Cox D.
Lestienne C.
3672
Cox D.
6351

Constant Lestienne defeated Daniel Cox 3-6 6-3 7-5 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lestienne C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cox D.

Cox D.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lestienne C.Cox D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lestienne C.Cox D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
30
Break points saved·Dominant
86
52
Break points won·Clear edge
39
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lestienne C.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Cox D.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 78 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 9
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
2.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Murray A.[2]
Rodionov J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Murray A.[2]
Thompson J.
7-656-3
Rodionov J.
Bergs Z.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Murray A.[2]
Kubler J.[5]
3-66-36-4
Rodionov J.
Diallo G.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Lestienne C.[6]
7-626-3
Thompson J.
Hijikata R.
7-616-2
R16
Hijikata R.
Ivashka I.[7]
7-627-64
Thompson J.
Svajda Z.
6-27-5
Kubler J.[5]
Peniston R.
6-37-65
Murray A.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
7-616-4
Bergs Z.
Saville L.
6-27-64
Diallo G.
Evans D.[1]
7-56-2
Rodionov J.
Eubanks C.[8]
6-26-4
Lestienne C.[6]
Kudla D.
7-646-4
R32
Kudla D.
Oconnell C.
6-35-76-2
Peniston R.
Vesely J.
6-46-2
Diallo G.
Broady L.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Virtanen O.
6-46-2
Murray A.[2]
Chung H.
6-36-2
Lestienne C.[6]
Cox D.
3-66-37-5
Yunchaokete B.
Wendelken H.
7-627-5
Evans D.[1]
Mccabe J.
6-46-4
Ivashka I.[7]
Grenier H.
7-56-1
Saville L.
Popyrin A.
6-736-47-66
Eubanks C.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-36-776-3
Thompson J.
Mcdonald M.[3]
6-46-4
Kubler J.[5]
Brouwer G.
6-17-64
Hijikata R.
Harris B.
6-37-5
Svajda Z.
Vukic A.
7-666-3
Bergs Z.
Whitehouse M.
7-646-2