Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Sho Shimabukuro — Vicenza CH Round of 32

Vicenza CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
ESP
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
#119ATP
1757ELO
1732Clay ELO
$268kYTD
$884kCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
clay
Sho Shimabukuro
JPN8
Sho Shimabukuro
#90ATP
1672ELO
1510Clay ELO
$268kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-3 6-3
Shimabukuro S.
Llamas Ruiz P.
662
Shimabukuro S.
330

Pablo Llamas Ruiz defeated Sho Shimabukuro 6-3 6-3 in the Vicenza CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sho Shimabukuro came in ranked #90.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Llamas Ruiz P.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Shimabukuro S.

Shimabukuro S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Llamas Ruiz P.

Serve advantage — Llamas Ruiz P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Llamas Ruiz P.Shimabukuro S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
69%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Llamas Ruiz P.Shimabukuro S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
42
Break points saved·Even
88
88
Break points won·Slight edge
39
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
50
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Llamas Ruiz P.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Shimabukuro S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+222 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1510
6.0Overall Elo 1757
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1672
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
8.0
Win streak
10.08-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
1.3
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Llamas Ruiz P.Shimabukuro S.
Freshness·Even
97
94

Llamas Ruiz P.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Shimabukuro S.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.
Llamas Ruiz P.
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Llamas Ruiz P.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-0
Comesana F.
Passaro F.[1]
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Passaro F.[1]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-4
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-2
Llamas Ruiz P.
Nardi L.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Serdarusic N.
Trungelliti M.
6-43-1
Nardi L.[2]
Svrcina D.
3-67-656-2
Passaro F.[1]
Ionel N.
6-31-67-62
Llamas Ruiz P.
Travaglia S.
4-66-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Navone M.
6-46-727-61
Comesana F.
Sachko V.
6-32-66-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-37-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Bellucci M.[6]
6-37-67
R32
Trungelliti M.
Rottoli L.
6-36-1
Burruchaga R.
Agamenone F.[5]
7-636-2
Passaro F.[1]
Neuchrist M.
7-56-3
Travaglia S.
Piraino G.
6-06-3
Serdarusic N.
Bonadio R.[4]
6-36-0
Nardi L.[2]
Darderi L.
1-66-16-3
Navone M.
Gaio F.
6-36-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Maestrelli F.
6-27-5
Collarini A.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-07-5
Bellucci M.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-3
Ionel N.
Fatic N.
6-46-4
Comesana F.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-37-64
Svrcina D.
Noguchi R.
6-46-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Shimabukuro S.[8]
6-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Gigante M.
1-66-16-1
Sachko V.
Sousa J.
6-27-64