Nathan Ponwith vs Christian Langmo — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Ponwith N.
2-6 7-5 7-5
Langmo C.
Ponwith N.
2772
Langmo C.
6551

Nathan Ponwith defeated Christian Langmo 2-6 7-5 7-5 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ponwith N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Serve advantage — Langmo C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ponwith N.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
7.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (45 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ponwith N.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Langmo C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.8
Surface form
8.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ponwith N.Langmo C.
Freshness·
—
65

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Walton A.
6-766-47-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[4]
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kukushkin M.
6-766-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-13-67-5
Lajal M.
Dougaz A.[7]
7-656-2
Walton A.
Galarneau A.
6-46-1
R16
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-27-5
Walton A.
Reis Da Silva J.
3-67-626-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Zhu E.
3-66-36-1
Zhukayev B.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-717-65
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-56-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Ponwith N.
6-16-2
Galarneau A.
Michelsen A.
3-66-36-3
Lajal M.
Wu T.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Gengel M.
2-66-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Kasnikowski M.
6-26-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Mansouri S.
7-56-3
Zhu E.
Boyer T.
6-46-777-62
Wu T.
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Wu T.[1]
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Ponwith N.
Langmo C.
2-67-57-5
Masur D.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Krueger M.
6-27-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-0
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-45-76-2
Michelsen A.
Yevseyev D.
4-66-37-5
Galarneau A.
Ficovich J.[6]
7-626-2
Kukushkin M.
Zheng M.
7-656-3