Mark Lajal vs Tung Lin Wu — Little Rock CH Round of 16

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE1
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Lajal M.
7-5 6-3
Wu T.
Lajal M.
762
Wu T.
530

Mark Lajal defeated Tung Lin Wu 7-5 6-3 in the Little Rock CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mark Lajal closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lajal M.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
84
Break points won·Slight edge
13
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Wu T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+180 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1376
6.8Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Wu T.
Freshness·Slight edge
88
80

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Walton A.
6-766-47-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[4]
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kukushkin M.
6-766-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-13-67-5
Lajal M.
Dougaz A.[7]
7-656-2
Walton A.
Galarneau A.
6-46-1
R16
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-27-5
Walton A.
Reis Da Silva J.
3-67-626-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Zhu E.
3-66-36-1
Zhukayev B.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-717-65
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-56-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Ponwith N.
6-16-2
Galarneau A.
Michelsen A.
3-66-36-3
Lajal M.
Wu T.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Gengel M.
2-66-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Kasnikowski M.
6-26-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Mansouri S.
7-56-3
Zhu E.
Boyer T.
6-46-777-62
Wu T.
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Wu T.[1]
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Ponwith N.
Langmo C.
2-67-57-5
Masur D.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Krueger M.
6-27-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-0
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-45-76-2
Michelsen A.
Yevseyev D.
4-66-37-5
Galarneau A.
Ficovich J.[6]
7-626-2
Kukushkin M.
Zheng M.
7-656-3