Beibit Zhukayev vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Little Rock CH Quarter-final

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#316ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#305ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Zhukayev B.
6-7 6-4 7-5
Kukushkin M.
Zhukayev B.
66672
Kukushkin M.
78451

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 6-7 6-4 7-5 in the Little Rock CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
31
46
Break points saved·Even
94
93
Break points won·Dominant
1
41
Deciding sets·Clear edge
25
41
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
63
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
6.7+124 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1455
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1552
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Walton A.
6-766-47-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[4]
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kukushkin M.
6-766-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-13-67-5
Lajal M.
Dougaz A.[7]
7-656-2
Walton A.
Galarneau A.
6-46-1
R16
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-27-5
Walton A.
Reis Da Silva J.
3-67-626-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Zhu E.
3-66-36-1
Zhukayev B.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-717-65
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-56-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Ponwith N.
6-16-2
Galarneau A.
Michelsen A.
3-66-36-3
Lajal M.
Wu T.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Gengel M.
2-66-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Kasnikowski M.
6-26-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Mansouri S.
7-56-3
Zhu E.
Boyer T.
6-46-777-62
Wu T.
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Wu T.[1]
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Ponwith N.
Langmo C.
2-67-57-5
Masur D.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Krueger M.
6-27-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-0
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-45-76-2
Michelsen A.
Yevseyev D.
4-66-37-5
Galarneau A.
Ficovich J.[6]
7-626-2
Kukushkin M.
Zheng M.
7-656-3