Ivan Gakhov vs Lukas Klein — Troisdorf CH Round of 16

Troisdorf CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
clay
Lukas Klein
SVK4
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Gakhov I.
6-4 6-2
Klein L.
Gakhov I.
662
Klein L.
420

Ivan Gakhov defeated Lukas Klein 6-4 6-2 in the Troisdorf CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Klein came in ranked #185, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Klein L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Klein L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
92
Break points won·Slight edge
9
1
Deciding sets·Even
59
63
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
22
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Klein L.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.0Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
8.0+240 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1601
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gakhov I.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-25-76-3
Semi-finals
Gakhov I.
Kotov P.[1]
6-756-16-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Nagal S.
6-23-66-4
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.[1]
Strombachs R.
2-66-36-4
Gakhov I.
Hardt N.
3-67-637-64
Ferreira Silva F.
Olivo R.
6-36-2
Nagal S.
Krutykh O.
6-11-66-4
R16
Hardt N.
Moraing M.
6-21-67-64
Strombachs R.
Casanova H.
6-46-0
Nagal S.
Choinski J.
W/O
Ferreira Silva F.
Hassan B.
6-33-66-2
Gakhov I.
Klein L.[4]
6-46-2
Kotov P.[1]
Atmane T.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Friberg K.
1-66-16-4
Olivo R.
Hong S.
6-33-66-4
R32
Krutykh O.
Celikbilek A.
6-06-4
Casanova H.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Laaksonen H.
6-33-66-1
Atmane T.
Hsu Y.
6-17-63
Hong S.
Piros Z.[2]
3-66-06-0
Choinski J.
Pereira J.
6-46-3
Moraing M.
Sels J.[8]
6-26-3
Gakhov I.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-0
Klein L.[4]
Topo M.
6-36-726-4
Strombachs R.
Kovalik J.[6]
7-57-65
Hassan B.
Uchida K.[7]
6-36-3
Hardt N.
Tseng C.
4-67-626-2
Kotov P.[1]
De Loore J.
3-67-656-1
Nagal S.
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-67-5
Friberg K.
Misolic F.[5]
7-54-66-4
Olivo R.
Squire H.
6-27-5