Nicholas David Ionel vs Nerman Fatic — Vicenza CH Round of 32

Vicenza CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicholas David Ionel
ROU
Nicholas David Ionel
#807ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Ionel N.
6-4 6-4
Fatic N.
Ionel N.
662
Fatic N.
440

Nicholas David Ionel defeated Nerman Fatic 6-4 6-4 in the Vicenza CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nerman Fatic came in ranked #396, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ionel N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ionel N.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ionel N.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ionel N.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
3
24
Break points saved·Dominant
36
63
Break points won·Slight edge
41
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
6
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ionel N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fatic N.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.
Llamas Ruiz P.
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Llamas Ruiz P.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-0
Comesana F.
Passaro F.[1]
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Passaro F.[1]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-4
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-2
Llamas Ruiz P.
Nardi L.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Serdarusic N.
Trungelliti M.
6-43-1
Nardi L.[2]
Svrcina D.
3-67-656-2
Passaro F.[1]
Ionel N.
6-31-67-62
Llamas Ruiz P.
Travaglia S.
4-66-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Navone M.
6-46-727-61
Comesana F.
Sachko V.
6-32-66-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Collarini A.
6-37-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Bellucci M.[6]
6-37-67
R32
Trungelliti M.
Rottoli L.
6-36-1
Burruchaga R.
Agamenone F.[5]
7-636-2
Passaro F.[1]
Neuchrist M.
7-56-3
Travaglia S.
Piraino G.
6-06-3
Serdarusic N.
Bonadio R.[4]
6-36-0
Nardi L.[2]
Darderi L.
1-66-16-3
Navone M.
Gaio F.
6-36-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Maestrelli F.
6-27-5
Collarini A.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-07-5
Bellucci M.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-3
Ionel N.
Fatic N.
6-46-4
Comesana F.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-37-64
Svrcina D.
Noguchi R.
6-46-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Shimabukuro S.[8]
6-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Gigante M.
1-66-16-1
Sachko V.
Sousa J.
6-27-64