Antoine Escoffier vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Little Rock CH Quarter-final

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA4
Antoine Escoffier
#581ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
hard
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Escoffier A.
6-1 3-6 7-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Escoffier A.
6372
Kwiatkowski T.
1651

Antoine Escoffier defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 6-1 3-6 7-5 in the Little Rock CH quarter-final on hard. Antoine Escoffier claimed a first win over Thai Son Kwiatkowski in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Antoine Escoffier came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-30WashingtonQ2hardThai Son Kwiatkowski3-6 6-1 5-2 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
5
Break points saved·Even
68
65
Break points won·Clear edge
18
6
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
1
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kwiatkowski T.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lajal M.
Zhukayev B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Walton A.
6-766-47-64
Lajal M.
Escoffier A.[4]
4-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kukushkin M.
6-766-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-13-67-5
Lajal M.
Dougaz A.[7]
7-656-2
Walton A.
Galarneau A.
6-46-1
R16
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-27-5
Walton A.
Reis Da Silva J.
3-67-626-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Zhu E.
3-66-36-1
Zhukayev B.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-717-65
Kwiatkowski T.
Masur D.
7-56-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Ponwith N.
6-16-2
Galarneau A.
Michelsen A.
3-66-36-3
Lajal M.
Wu T.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
Gengel M.
2-66-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Kasnikowski M.
6-26-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Escoffier A.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[7]
Mansouri S.
7-56-3
Zhu E.
Boyer T.
6-46-777-62
Wu T.
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Wu T.[1]
Kuzuhara B.
6-34-66-4
Ponwith N.
Langmo C.
2-67-57-5
Masur D.
Uchiyama Y.[5]
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Krueger M.
6-27-63
Sandgren T.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-0
Walton A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-45-76-2
Michelsen A.
Yevseyev D.
4-66-37-5
Galarneau A.
Ficovich J.[6]
7-626-2
Kukushkin M.
Zheng M.
7-656-3