Terence Atmane vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Troisdorf CH Round of 32

Troisdorf CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Terence Atmane
FRA
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1628Clay ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
clay
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1407Clay ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Atmane T.
6-1 7-6
Hsu Y.
Atmane T.
6772
Hsu Y.
1630

Terence Atmane defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-1 7-6 in the Troisdorf CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

  • Match story: Terence Atmane came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Atmane T.Hsu Y.
45
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
74
Break points won·Clear edge
25
4
Deciding sets·Even
54
50
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Hsu Y.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+221 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Clay Elo 1407
7.9Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1489
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.4
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Hsu Y.
Freshness·
96
—

Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gakhov I.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-25-76-3
Semi-finals
Gakhov I.
Kotov P.[1]
6-756-16-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Nagal S.
6-23-66-4
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.[1]
Strombachs R.
2-66-36-4
Gakhov I.
Hardt N.
3-67-637-64
Ferreira Silva F.
Olivo R.
6-36-2
Nagal S.
Krutykh O.
6-11-66-4
R16
Hardt N.
Moraing M.
6-21-67-64
Strombachs R.
Casanova H.
6-46-0
Nagal S.
Choinski J.
W/O
Ferreira Silva F.
Hassan B.
6-33-66-2
Gakhov I.
Klein L.[4]
6-46-2
Kotov P.[1]
Atmane T.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Friberg K.
1-66-16-4
Olivo R.
Hong S.
6-33-66-4
R32
Krutykh O.
Celikbilek A.
6-06-4
Casanova H.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Laaksonen H.
6-33-66-1
Atmane T.
Hsu Y.
6-17-63
Hong S.
Piros Z.[2]
3-66-06-0
Choinski J.
Pereira J.
6-46-3
Moraing M.
Sels J.[8]
6-26-3
Gakhov I.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-0
Klein L.[4]
Topo M.
6-36-726-4
Strombachs R.
Kovalik J.[6]
7-57-65
Hassan B.
Uchida K.[7]
6-36-3
Hardt N.
Tseng C.
4-67-626-2
Kotov P.[1]
De Loore J.
3-67-656-1
Nagal S.
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-67-5
Friberg K.
Misolic F.[5]
7-54-66-4
Olivo R.
Squire H.
6-27-5