Varvara Gracheva vs Selena Janicijevic — Strasbourg Round of 16

Strasbourg · WTA · Round of 16
Varvara Gracheva
FRA6
Varvara Gracheva
#95WTA
1810ELO
1701Clay ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 May 2023
clay
FRA
Selena Janicijevic
#240WTA
1439ELO
1420Clay ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWL
Gracheva V.
6-2 6-1
Janicijevic S.
Gracheva V.
662
Janicijevic S.
210

Varvara Gracheva defeated Selena Janicijevic 6-2 6-1 in the Strasbourg round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Varvara Gracheva came in ranked #95, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gracheva V.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Janicijevic S.

Janicijevic S.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gracheva V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gracheva V.Janicijevic S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
53%
54%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gracheva V.Janicijevic S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
15
Break points saved·Dominant
76
38
Break points won·Even
87
89
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
5
Tiebreaks·
65
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gracheva V.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Janicijevic S.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 126 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.1+282 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1420
10.0Overall Elo 1810
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1439
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Svitolina E.
Blinkova A.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Svitolina E.
Burel C.
4-67-56-3
Blinkova A.
Davis L.[7]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Davis L.[7]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
1-67-626-0
Burel C.
Pera B.[4]
6-23-66-4
Blinkova A.
Navarro E.
6-46-4
Svitolina E.
Gracheva V.[6]
6-36-4
R16
Burel C.
Kanepi K.
7-57-60
Svitolina E.
Routliffe E.
W/O
Navarro E.
Teichmann J.[8]
2-66-36-2
Pera B.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-4
Gracheva V.[6]
Janicijevic S.
6-26-1
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Linette M.[1]
6-36-2
Davis L.[7]
Tomova V.
6-43-66-1
Blinkova A.
Friedsam A.
6-47-611
R32
Svitolina E.
Chirico L.
6-47-61
Routliffe E.
Hsieh S.
7-621-66-1
Friedsam A.
Zhang S.[3]
6-06-0
Teichmann J.[8]
Zanevska M.
4-66-36-4
Tomova V.
Cornet A.
3-66-47-5
Navarro E.
Martincova T.
6-26-3
Kanepi K.
Wang X.
6-36-2
Pera B.[4]
Chang S.
6-44-66-1
Janicijevic S.
Dodin O.
2-66-16-4
Birrell K.
Malygina E.
6-26-3
Gracheva V.[6]
Bai Z.
6-33-67-63
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Gabueva A.
6-36-1
Blinkova A.
Hesse A.
4-66-06-4
Linette M.[1]
Bucsa C.
4-66-26-2
Davis L.[7]
Iliev S.
7-56-0
Burel C.
Cirstea S.[5]
7-657-5