Julia Grabher vs Cagla Buyukakcay — Rabat Round of 16

Rabat · WTA · Round of 16
Julia Grabher
AUT
Julia Grabher
#116WTA
1613ELO
1593Clay ELO
30 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 May 2023
clay
Cagla Buyukakcay
TUR
Cagla Buyukakcay
#373WTA
1322ELO
1304Clay ELO
36 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLLL
Grabher J.
6-1 7-6
Buyukakcay C.
Grabher J.
6772
Buyukakcay C.
1640

Julia Grabher defeated Cagla Buyukakcay 6-1 7-6 in the Rabat round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Julia Grabher came in ranked #116.

Key context

  • Match story: Julia Grabher came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Grabher J.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Buyukakcay C.

Buyukakcay C.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Grabher J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Grabher J.Buyukakcay C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
73%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
52%
Return points won·Even
45%
47%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.2
0.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Grabher J.Buyukakcay C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
0
Break points saved·Dominant
39
7
Break points won·Dominant
91
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
62
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Grabher J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Buyukakcay C.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 37 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.7+288 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1304
8.6Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1322
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Grabher J.Buyukakcay C.
Freshness·
70
—

Grabher J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 65%

Draw

Final
Bronzetti L.
Grabher J.
6-45-77-5
Semi-finals
Bronzetti L.
Stephens S.[2]
6-16-1
Grabher J.
Riera J.
6-13-67-66
Quarter-finals
Bronzetti L.
Parks A.[4]
6-26-0
Stephens S.[2]
Stearns P.
6-746-37-66
Grabher J.
Trevisan M.[1]
6-3
Riera J.
Putintseva Y.[6]
5-76-46-2
R16
Parks A.[4]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-1
Stearns P.
Fernandez L.[5]
6-32-66-2
Bronzetti L.
Maria T.[8]
6-716-47-5
Riera J.
Sherif M.[3]
7-57-5
Grabher J.
Buyukakcay C.
6-17-64
Putintseva Y.[6]
Jeanjean L.
6-26-1
Stephens S.[2]
Babos T.
6-36-1
Trevisan M.[1]
Fett J.
7-57-5
R32
Putintseva Y.[6]
El Aouni A.
6-16-4
Rakhimova K.
El Allami M.
6-36-3
Babos T.
Khromacheva I.
6-46-1
Trevisan M.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-2
Fernandez L.[5]
Fita Boluda A.
6-36-4
Bronzetti L.
Peterson R.
6-47-64
Grabher J.
Bonaventure Y.
6-736-46-2
Buyukakcay C.
Fruhvirtova L.[7]
7-56-4
Sherif M.[3]
Baindl K.
6-16-3
Maria T.[8]
Prozorova T.
7-56-756-0
Parks A.[4]
Tikhonova A.
6-37-66
Stearns P.
Udvardy P.
6-16-1
Riera J.
Mladenovic K.
6-36-0
Fett J.
Nahimana S.
6-06-4
Jeanjean L.
Lee G.
7-645-76-3
Stephens S.[2]
Zvonareva V.
7-56-4