Sloane Stephens vs Timea Babos — Rabat Round of 16

Rabat · WTA · Round of 16
Sloane Stephens
USA2
Sloane Stephens
#315WTA
1683ELO
1664Clay ELO
33 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 May 2023
clay
HUN
Timea Babos
33 yrs · 179 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLL
Stephens S.
6-3 6-1
Babos T.
Stephens S.
662
Babos T.
310

Sloane Stephens defeated Timea Babos 6-3 6-1 in the Rabat round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sloane Stephens came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Sloane Stephens extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-01-14Australian OpenR64hardSloane Stephens6-3 6-1
2012-05-21StrasbourgR16claySloane Stephens6-2 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Stephens S.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Babos T.

Babos T.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Stephens S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stephens S.Babos T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stephens S.Babos T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
0
Break points saved·Dominant
78
51
Break points won·Dominant
90
48
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stephens S.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Babos T.
3.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 315 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
0.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 65%

Draw

Final
Bronzetti L.
Grabher J.
6-45-77-5
Semi-finals
Bronzetti L.
Stephens S.[2]
6-16-1
Grabher J.
Riera J.
6-13-67-66
Quarter-finals
Bronzetti L.
Parks A.[4]
6-26-0
Stephens S.[2]
Stearns P.
6-746-37-66
Grabher J.
Trevisan M.[1]
6-3
Riera J.
Putintseva Y.[6]
5-76-46-2
R16
Parks A.[4]
Rakhimova K.
6-46-1
Stearns P.
Fernandez L.[5]
6-32-66-2
Bronzetti L.
Maria T.[8]
6-716-47-5
Riera J.
Sherif M.[3]
7-57-5
Grabher J.
Buyukakcay C.
6-17-64
Putintseva Y.[6]
Jeanjean L.
6-26-1
Stephens S.[2]
Babos T.
6-36-1
Trevisan M.[1]
Fett J.
7-57-5
R32
Putintseva Y.[6]
El Aouni A.
6-16-4
Rakhimova K.
El Allami M.
6-36-3
Babos T.
Khromacheva I.
6-46-1
Trevisan M.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-2
Fernandez L.[5]
Fita Boluda A.
6-36-4
Bronzetti L.
Peterson R.
6-47-64
Grabher J.
Bonaventure Y.
6-736-46-2
Buyukakcay C.
Fruhvirtova L.[7]
7-56-4
Sherif M.[3]
Baindl K.
6-16-3
Maria T.[8]
Prozorova T.
7-56-756-0
Parks A.[4]
Tikhonova A.
6-37-66
Stearns P.
Udvardy P.
6-16-1
Riera J.
Mladenovic K.
6-36-0
Fett J.
Nahimana S.
6-06-4
Jeanjean L.
Lee G.
7-645-76-3
Stephens S.[2]
Zvonareva V.
7-56-4