Sho Shimabukuro vs Jesper De Jong — Tunis CH Semi-final

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Sho Shimabukuro
JPN
Sho Shimabukuro
#95ATP
1672ELO
1510Clay ELO
$268kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 May 2023
clay
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Shimabukuro S.
6-3 6-1
De Jong J.
Shimabukuro S.
662
De Jong J.
310

Sho Shimabukuro defeated Jesper De Jong 6-3 6-1 in the Tunis CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73. Sho Shimabukuro extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonQ2grassSho Shimabukuro7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8)

Serve vs return

This season
Shimabukuro S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Shimabukuro S.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shimabukuro S.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shimabukuro S.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
57
Break points saved·Even
88
90
Break points won·Slight edge
31
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
50
69
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
38
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shimabukuro S.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
De Jong J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Clay Elo 1510
Surface ELO
6.7+186 Clay Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1672
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1711
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shimabukuro S.De Jong J.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
78

Shimabukuro S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
De Jong J.
6-36-1
Blancaneaux G.
Gojo B.[1]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[1]
Mensik J.
6-26-0
Blancaneaux G.
Marterer M.[4]
5-2
Shimabukuro S.
Dougaz A.
2-67-56-3
De Jong J.
Dzumhur D.[8]
7-54-66-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Coppejans K.
6-22-66-3
De Jong J.
Weis A.
6-46-3
Shimabukuro S.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
3-66-36-2
Dzumhur D.[8]
Novak D.
6-46-0
Dougaz A.
Tirante T.[5]
6-46-3
Mensik J.
Ionel N.
6-756-47-5
Gojo B.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-26-1
Marterer M.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-4
R32
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Gigante M.
6-11-0
Weis A.
Broady L.[2]
6-05-76-3
De Jong J.
Cuevas P.
7-602-1
Mensik J.
Lokoli L.
6-46-2
Ionel N.
Bellucci M.[7]
7-656-2
Blancaneaux G.
Sousa J.[6]
6-35-76-4
Dougaz A.
Jaziri M.
6-36-1
Shimabukuro S.
Olivieri G.
6-726-36-4
Novak D.
Bailly G.
2-66-37-63
Tirante T.[5]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-4
Coppejans K.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Gojo B.[1]
Mejia N.
6-47-64
Marterer M.[4]
Tabilo A.
6-36-2
Rincon D.
De Loore J.
4-67-56-3
Noguchi R.
Wenger D.
6-26-2
Dzumhur D.[8]
Ouakaa A.
1-66-06-2