Jesper De Jong vs Damir Dzumhur — Tunis CH Quarter-final

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 May 2023
clay
Damir Dzumhur
BIH8
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1594Clay ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
De Jong J.
7-5 4-6 6-3
Dzumhur D.
De Jong J.
7462
Dzumhur D.
5631

Jesper De Jong defeated Damir Dzumhur 7-5 4-6 6-3 in the Tunis CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

  • Match story: Jesper De Jong closed it out in three sets, 7–5 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Dzumhur D.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Dzumhur D.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
53

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Dzumhur D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Dzumhur D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
70
Break points saved·Even
90
87
Break points won·Dominant
37
64
Deciding sets·Slight edge
69
80
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
62
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Dzumhur D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+102 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Clay Elo 1594
4.9Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1638
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Dzumhur D.
Freshness·Even
78
76

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d) · Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
De Jong J.
6-36-1
Blancaneaux G.
Gojo B.[1]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[1]
Mensik J.
6-26-0
Blancaneaux G.
Marterer M.[4]
5-2
Shimabukuro S.
Dougaz A.
2-67-56-3
De Jong J.
Dzumhur D.[8]
7-54-66-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Coppejans K.
6-22-66-3
De Jong J.
Weis A.
6-46-3
Shimabukuro S.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
3-66-36-2
Dzumhur D.[8]
Novak D.
6-46-0
Dougaz A.
Tirante T.[5]
6-46-3
Mensik J.
Ionel N.
6-756-47-5
Gojo B.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-26-1
Marterer M.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-4
R32
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Gigante M.
6-11-0
Weis A.
Broady L.[2]
6-05-76-3
De Jong J.
Cuevas P.
7-602-1
Mensik J.
Lokoli L.
6-46-2
Ionel N.
Bellucci M.[7]
7-656-2
Blancaneaux G.
Sousa J.[6]
6-35-76-4
Dougaz A.
Jaziri M.
6-36-1
Shimabukuro S.
Olivieri G.
6-726-36-4
Novak D.
Bailly G.
2-66-37-63
Tirante T.[5]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-4
Coppejans K.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Gojo B.[1]
Mejia N.
6-47-64
Marterer M.[4]
Tabilo A.
6-36-2
Rincon D.
De Loore J.
4-67-56-3
Noguchi R.
Wenger D.
6-26-2
Dzumhur D.[8]
Ouakaa A.
1-66-06-2