Max Purcell vs Yuki Mochizuki — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS1
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
hard
JPN
Yuki Mochizuki
28 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLW
Purcell M.
6-3 6-3
Mochizuki Y.
Purcell M.
662
Mochizuki Y.
330

Max Purcell defeated Yuki Mochizuki 6-3 6-3 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Max Purcell came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mochizuki Y.

Mochizuki Y.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Mochizuki Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
69%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
73%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
2.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mochizuki Y.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vukic A.[6]
Purcell M.[1]
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Diallo G.
6-47-5
Vukic A.[6]
Holt B.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Holt B.
Tu L.
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Diallo G.
Thompson J.[3]
6-37-5
Vukic A.[6]
Eubanks C.[2]
6-747-636-4
R16
Purcell M.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-26-4
Diallo G.
Chung Y.
7-657-64
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Jung J.
6-46-3
Holt B.
Saville L.
6-36-3
Vukic A.[6]
Shimabukuro S.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-43-66-4
Tu L.
Celikbilek A.
6-47-65
R32
Jung J.
Hong S.
6-23-0
Purcell M.[1]
Mochizuki Y.
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Tokuda R.
7-646-3
Tu L.
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-4
Shimabukuro S.
Moriya H.
6-726-27-5
Vukic A.[6]
Harris L.
7-656-3
Holt B.
Gomez E.[4]
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-26-4
Thompson J.[3]
Masur D.
6-16-1
Hijikata R.[5]
Jasika O.
6-766-36-2
Uchiyama Y.
Chung H.
6-36-736-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Polmans M.
4-66-37-66
Saville L.
Berankis R.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Donskoy E.
Shimizu Y.
7-53-66-0
Diallo G.
Nam J.
6-36-3